Cutter IT Journal
Cutter IT Journal

The Prism View Technique: A CIO’s Framework for Designing Successful Organizational Training Programs


Author Companion Summary

This page is an author companion summary of my published Cutter article:

Pruseth, D. (2013). The Prism View Technique: A CIO’s Framework for Designing Successful Organizational Training Programs. Cutter.

Read the official article on Cutter

Summary

Many CIOs and organizational leaders view training needs at a broad, macro level. Training is often treated as a function within the training department, a set of standard learning objectives, or a collection of common goals included in employee appraisal forms. This traditional push strategy of training, where HR designs and distributes training programs based on a broad interpretation of organizational requirements, is increasingly insufficient in the knowledge economy.

In modern organizations, training must evolve from a push-based model to a more forward-looking pull strategy. In a pull-based approach, employees actively contribute to shaping the learning ecosystem. HR and senior management continue to provide guidance, governance, and resources, but the design of training becomes more responsive to employee roles, aspirations, business needs, and changing organizational capabilities.

To achieve this, CIOs need a deeper understanding of the roles, responsibilities, expectations, and aspirations of the different stakeholders involved in the training landscape. These stakeholders may include employees, managers, HR teams, business leaders, technology teams, competitors, vendors, and external market forces.

One technique that can help CIOs build this understanding is the Prism View Technique.

The metaphor is simple. When white light passes through a prism, it scatters into different colors. Each color has its own identity, position, characteristic, and intensity. Some colors appear brighter, while others may appear weaker, depending on the nature of the light, the quality of the prism, and the surface on which the light is projected.

Similarly, an organization’s current training program can be viewed as white light. When this training program is passed through the “prism” of organizational analysis, it separates into different entities or dimensions. For example:

  • Violet may represent the training department.
  • Indigo may represent employees.
  • Blue may represent the competitor environment.
  • Green may represent the technology or system requirements for training.
  • Other colors may represent business strategy, management expectations, vendor capability, organizational culture, or future skill requirements.

The first step is to list all important entities in the training ecosystem. The next step is to examine each entity in detail, just as each color in the prism has its own position and characteristics.

For each entity, leaders should ask:

  • What input does this entity provide to the training ecosystem?
  • What output is expected from it?
  • What are its expectations?
  • Are the expectations of different entities aligned?
  • Are there visible gaps between what the training department provides and what employees need?
  • Is the training system stronger than the training process itself?
  • Are business needs and employee aspirations moving in the same direction?

For example, if the training department expects standardized participation but employees expect personalized growth, there is a gap that needs to be addressed. If the organization has invested in a strong learning management system but the training department lacks the capability to use it effectively, the system may appear strong while the process remains weak.

In this framework, the prism represents the organization’s current strategy and management perspective. The white light represents the existing training program. The scattered colors represent the different stakeholders, systems, expectations, and environmental factors that shape training success. The surface on which the light is projected represents the current organizational landscape.

The value of the Prism View Technique lies in making hidden misalignments visible. It helps CIOs and business leaders move beyond a one-dimensional view of training and instead analyze the training ecosystem from multiple perspectives. This can support the design of more relevant, adaptive, and long-term organizational learning programs.


Prism View Framework

Suggested Citation

Pruseth, D. (2013). The Prism View Technique: A CIO’s Framework for Designing Successful Organizational Training Programs. Cutter.


Discover more from Debabrata Pruseth

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Scroll to Top